Physical attractiveness and dating choice a test of the matching hypothesis

physical attractiveness and dating choice a test of the matching hypothesis

Does physical attractiveness matter when it comes to dating?

The Walster et al. (1966) experiment, conducted in a computer dating setting, did not support the matching hypothesis. An individuals own level of physical attractiveness affected neither his liking for his or her date nor his tendency to ask out the date a second time.

What is the matching hypothesis?

The matching hypothesis states that individuals pick partners who have a similar level of physical attractiveness, this increases the chances of intimacy being reciprocated.

Is attractiveness due to complex matching?

Walster was unable to provide proof for the matching hypothesis, Sprecher and Hatfield believe this is due to complex matching. They argue that physical attractiveness is only one of many valuable characteristics.

Why is Walsters matching hypothesis called realistic?

These choices are referred to as realistic by Walster because when individuals seek others who are similar in attractiveness it increases the chances of affection being reciprocated. Although the matching hypothesis covers a number of valuable assets (i.e. kindness), it is more closely associated with physical attractiveness.

Is physical attractiveness more important to men or women?

However, experimental research, as well as evidence from online dating and speed dating, shows that physical attractiveness is equally important to men and women.

Is physical attractiveness biased in dating?

Physical attractiveness has long been an instigator of biased thinking, especially with regards to dating selection. For instance, due to the effects of physical attraction stereotypes adults who are more attractive tend to be treated more positively than their more unattractive counterparts (Rohner & Rasmussen, 2012, p. 239).

What is the physical attraction stereotype in dating?

Dating and the Physical Attractiveness Stereotype. The physical attraction stereotype describes that attractiveness of an individual can distort others perception of that individual’s character qualities (Schneider, Gruman, & Coutts, 2005, p. 357). Higher attractive individuals tend to be perceived as having more positive qualities,...

Do looks really matter in dating?

Physical Attractiveness does matter and attractive people are pleasing to look at, but looks go beyond just finding a person attractive. There are other things looks are associated with such as good looks representing good things about a person (Gruman et al, 2017). Is this true?

What is Walsters matching hypothesis?

Walster et al proposed The Matching Hypothesis, that similar people end up together. The more physically desirable someone is, the more desirable they would expect their partner to be. An individual would often choose to date a partner of approximately their own attractiveness.

What is the matching hypothesis in psychology?

The matching hypothesis (Walster et al., 1966) suggests that people realise at a young age that not everybody can form relationships with the most attractive people, so it is important to evaluate their own attractiveness and from this, partners which are the most attainable.

Did Walster advertise acomputer match dance?

Walster advertised a Computer Match Dance. 752 student participants were rated on physical attractiveness by four independent judges, as a measure of social desirability. Participants were told to fill in a questionnaire for the purposes of computer matching based on similarity.

What are some criticisms of Walsters study on attractiveness?

One criticism Walster assigned to the study was that the four judges who assigned the attractiveness ratings to the participants had very brief interactions with them. Longer exposure may have changed the attraction ratings.

Related posts: